A claim needs testing.
Conflicting accounts, allegations or incomplete records are affecting a legal, corporate or private decision.
Corporate private investigations, due diligence and lawful OSINT research for decisions that need a clearer factual basis. Define the question, verify the evidence and make limitations visible.
FORGED-CS defines the investigative question, identifies lawful sources, tests claims and connects relevant people, events and relationships. We focus on what can be verified and what remains uncertain.
Where regulated investigative work is required, FORGED-CS can define the scope and coordinate appropriately licensed providers while maintaining a clear client-side standard.
The objective is a defensible operating picture—not a volume of untested information.Conflicting accounts, allegations or incomplete records are affecting a legal, corporate or private decision.
Due diligence, background, relationships, reputation or exposure must be assessed before action.
Online activity, behaviour, events and physical exposure must be connected and prioritized.
The question, authority, sources, constraints and evidentiary standard.
Relevant facts, source confidence, contradictions and limitations.
Connections, timelines, access, influence and material changes.
Practical options matched to evidence, urgency and proportionality.
Define the question, stakes, authority and decision.
Gather relevant open, human and specialist information.
Test sources, identities, claims, timelines and context.
Present findings, confidence and next actions clearly.
SCOPE / DELIVERABLES / NEXT STEPS
Before a business relationship or transaction, define which facts would change the decision. A due diligence investigation can examine relevant public records, business relationships and inconsistencies that warrant clarification. Identity matching and corroboration matter: a similar name or an isolated allegation is not a finding.
Unexplained information exposure, conflicts of interest or inconsistent accounts may justify a structured review. Preserve relevant material and establish authority before expanding the work. Our corporate espionage article explains possible warning signs; those signs alone do not establish wrongdoing.
The scope can include a written research plan, evidence register, source preservation, timeline or link analysis, and a findings report. Facts, allegations and inferences are separated, with confidence, limitations and unanswered questions stated. Work requiring regulated activity or specialist expertise is scoped with the appropriate qualified provider.
Open-source intelligence uses lawfully accessible information to answer a defined question. Collection alone is not enough: sources need context, identity checks and corroboration. Access to private accounts or restricted systems is not part of public-source research.
The report should explain the question, scope, method, sources, findings and limitations. It should identify what is verified, what is alleged and what remains unresolved, then connect those distinctions to the next business decision.
Each enquiry is assessed for a legitimate purpose, authority, jurisdiction and an appropriate method. The written scope establishes what work can be undertaken and whether licensed specialists are required.
Discuss the matter or book a private-investigations capability demonstration.